Canonical identity and product scope
The current defensible canonical domain is clothoff.net. It presents a consistent ClothOff brand across its homepage, API, terms, privacy, acceptable-use, mobile, and Telegram pages, with matching support contacts. The earlier clothoff.io domain is no longer resolving; historical infrastructure records connect .net and .app with that former surface. Clothoff.ai is an active lookalike with a different site structure, regional-domain network, pricing, and policy set and is not treated here as the same canonical service. This identity conclusion has medium-high confidence because the current first-party property is coherent even though the historical transition is not explained in a current public notice.
Synthetic editing capabilities
ClothOff advertises an image-to-image transformation that replaces clothing and body pixels with synthetic content. Its developer page also lists video styles, clothing changes, pose changes, prompt-based adult generation, body-presentation controls, and photo/video face swap. The result is a deepfake or other synthetic medium, not a recovered view of anything hidden beneath the source clothing. The service does not publish the model architecture, training method, or independent accuracy evidence.
Consent, policy, and documented enforcement gaps
Current terms say users must be adults, must have permission for images of other people, and must not process minors or create non-consensual sexual material. They also restrict downloading or distributing generated results. Those written rules do not prove effective enforcement. A public data-protection authority notice states that the examined service lacked a system to verify the depicted person's consent and did not label outputs as artificial, and reputable reporting has documented non-consensual misuse. The practical rule is therefore strict: do not upload any real person's image without explicit, informed likeness consent, and never create or share intimate synthetic material of a non-consenting person.
Upload privacy and risk evaluation
The service's current terms claim session-limited processing and deletion, while its privacy page separately describes account, cookie, partner, and operational data. These are first-party statements rather than an independent technical guarantee, and the exact processing path for web, Telegram, app, and API submissions is not publicly documented. Sensitive uploads create exposure even if the final output is never shared. Readers assessing this category should use the undress-tool safety guide and image-upload privacy guide, which focus on consent, retention, access, deletion, payment, and synthetic-media labeling without teaching non-consensual use.
Technical context
These dossiers explain the broader image-control and temporal problem space; they do not assert an undisclosed ClothOff architecture.